Quantum Physics - The Double Slit Experiment (wave - particle duality)
79Paint balls through double split
Wave Particle Duality
Now to understand this experiment we first need to look at 2 things.
1. Matter
2. Waves
We will look at this with reference to the experiment we are studying.
Matter
If we take a macro (something large like paint balls) sized piece of matter, and we shoot it through a sheet of metal placed in front with a single slit of it and a screen behind to show where they land, now common sense tells you that they will form a straight line behind the slit...Correct, this is exactly what happens.
Now lets put a second silt in next to the other slit, what does the screen show now, again it matches with common sense it produces 2 lines of paint behind each of the slits, as well as a lot of mess on the metal sheet where the slits are; See image inset on right.
Waves through Single Slit
Waves through a double slit
Waves
If we look at waves for, example waves in a pond, and we do the same as we did for the paint balls. We put a screen with one slit in the middle and a screen to detect where they land at the back, then what pattern do you think would form? That’s right the wave spreads out after going through the slit with the most intense band just behind the slit spreading out as we go see image on right.
Now let’s add a second slit, now what happens? Where the top of the wave meets the bottom of the other wave, the waves cancel each other out, but where the top of a wave meets the top of the other wave, or bottom to bottom, we get a reinforced wave of extra bright ness and all those in-between, so we develop what is known as an interference pattern, bands of light and dark, where the waves have been constructive (reinforced) and destructive (cancelled each other out). See image to the right.
Quantum Effects
Ok let’s look at the Quantum Effects of this experiment. In this example we will be using electrons. Electrons are tiny particles of matter in fact it has a mass of just 9.10938215(45) ×10−31 kg, that’s very very small.
What happens when you fire these electrons through a single slit, well exactly what you would expect they form a band directly behind the slit, just as we expect with matter.
Now let’s add the second slit, expecting it to form 2 bands as with the paintball experiment we begin...whoa! It forms and interference pattern, matter forming an interference pattern, what’s going on? Physicists being smart thought about this and thought the electrons must be interfering with each other i.e. bouncing off each other to create this pattern. How can we solve this? The answer is let’s fire one electron at a time through the slit, then there is no way they can interfere with each other. This experiment was then left for an hour or so, when the scientists returned they saw an interference pattern! So we got an interference pattern just like waves, but from matter!
Interference pattern, with single electron at a time
The conclusion is the electron leaves the source as a particle, becomes a wave of potentials and interferes with itself when it hits the wall. Don't worry if this boggles the mind, it goes against everything common since tells us yet this IS what happens. This is known as the wave-particle duality, the concept that matter and energy exhibits both a wave-like and matter-like properties.
The electron once leaving the source goes into what is known as superposition, that’s is the electron takes every conceivable and unconceivable path, through both slits, through one slit, through no slits rebounding against the sheet, around the experiment. This is known as the electrons wave function and upon measuring it the wave function collapses and that is where the electron is found, in this example on the detector screen at the back.
Superposition
However physicists thought what happens if we try to detect which slit the electron is "really" going through, so they set up a detector at one of the slits, if it is detected it went through that slit if not it went through the other.
Now they released the electron and it went back to behaving like a particle and creates two bands, like in the first experiment with paint balls. Not the interference pattern! The very act of observing this caused it to only go through one slit.
So I here you say what did observing it have to do with anything? Well the fact is that observing the electron collapsed the wave function and forced it to go through a single slit, weird! Take a look at the video to summise what we have been disscussing, before moving on.
Summary of experiment
When you fire you electron source, what actually comes out is a Ψ (called psi, pronounced sigh) wave (i.e. a wave function). It is not random: it travels according to the perfectly predictable laws of wave propagation, moving out in all directions and interfering with itself and all that good stuff. According to the Copenhagen interpretation, the Ψ wave represents the probability of the photon being at any particular place. So at this stage, the question "Where is the electron?" does not have an answer—there is only a wave of probabilities traveling outward.
In terms of the math, we can represent Ψ with a drawing very similar to the drawing we used for a light wave at the beginning of the paper. But it's important to remember that the drawing means something very different! In a light wave, the height of the drawing corresponds to the strength of the electric field. In a Ψ wave, the height of the drawing represents the probability of finding the particle at a particular point. To make it more confusing, Ψ can be negative or positive, but the probability is always positive—the probability only cares how far from zero Ψ is, it doesn't matter at all which direction! So you might see something like this:
Wavefunction
Further material
- News | physics.org
A great resource of information for Physics - The double slit experiment and the collapse of the wavefunction
More information on collapsing wavefunctions, including a nice applet as a graphical representation of the double split results. - Double split experiment
A detailed look at the double split experiment history and evolution. Good resource for information.
Science News Feed
- Not all 'good cholesterol' is 'good': Raising HDL not a sure route to countering heart disease
Medical researchers explored naturally occurring genetic variations in humans to test the connection between HDL levels and heart attack. By studying the genes of roughly 170,000 individuals, the team discovered that, when examined together, the 15 HDL-raising variants they tested do not reduce the risk of heart attack. - 15 hours ago
- Bats: A good immune system ensures success in reproduction
Anyone who is healthy has more enthusiasm for reproduction. The same is true even for bats. Male bats with a good immune system are more successful in being selected by females during mate choice and reproduction than their ailing counterparts. - 15 hours ago
- The Rhine is five million years older than first thought: Age of the river corrected based on fossils
Scientists have examined the age of the Rhine based on fossils. They have discovered that the river is five million years older than previously believed. - 15 hours ago
So how does this apply to the experiment, well in the double split where we get the interference pattern, this is actually a probability pattern and of course, lots of electrons choose high-probability areas, only a few choose low-probability areas, and none of them choose zero-probability areas. That's why we see the interference pattern.
But when we put a measuring device to measure which slit the electron goes through we collapse the wave function and cause it to be 100% at one slit and 0% at the other hence why we get two bands and no interference pattern.
But of course, the theory also raises a lot of questions including;
-
What is this Ψ thing? What does it mean to say that ‘probability waves’ are flying through space, interfering with each other, and ‘collapsing’ into certainty?
-
What does it mean to "measure" it? Presumably the electron is bumping into, and interacting with, all kinds of things on the way to the metal sheet, but they apparently don't count as "measurements." At the same time, a measurement doesn't need to involve a person; you can stick a measuring device at one of the slits and never have a human being look at it, and the interference pattern on the back wall still disappears. So what is good enough to count as a "measurement"?
-
When you put a measuring device on a single slit, how does the wave going through the other slit "know" that it's supposed to collapse?
-
Isn't there some possible explanation that corresponds equally well to all the data, but makes more sense than this nonsense?
Some of these questions are completely unanswered, and some have had some thoughts and experiments however, understand this no one really “understands” this stuff not your teachers, not physicists no one, no one knows why Ψ can successfully predict experimental results but it does.
I will be writing more articles on quantum physics including some more mathematical interpretations of the experiments for those of you who are interested. There are also some great materials on the subject check out some of the books listed below.
Great material for further reading
Amazon Price: $8.86 List Price: $14.95 | |
Amazon Price: $2.99 | |
![]() | Amazon Price: $0.99 |
![]() | Amazon Price: $13.70 List Price: $22.50 |
![]() | Amazon Price: $9.05 List Price: $15.95 |
![]() | Amazon Price: $12.95 |
CommentsLoading...
Thanks, nice explanation!
This definitely opened my eyes the first time I researched the topic...thank you for your synopsis.
amazing hub! enjoyed reading it. quantum theory mechanics is great. just started by myself to write about.
keep up the good work!
Have you read the book "Quantum Success" or the film "Down the Rabbit Hole" very interesting subject. The Observer(ie us) also affects the outcome of quantum experiments.Nice Hub
Great Job and Excellent explanations of what is currently known. How would the electrons have interference during observation unless there was consciousness of being observed?
Hi! Wonderful! Very well written hub!
One of the greatest mysteries of quantum world reveled by the famous double slit experiment!
Yes there are many unanswered questions to the "accepted science"
* * * * *
Never say "NO" to science!
There may be someone out there...quietly developing a theory than can explain the double slits, and the quantum tunnelings, and the bose-einstein condensates...
John G Cramer has already explained the double slit experiment in 1986...though it's not accepted science yet.
And I categorically say here that John G Cramer is right and his explantions by....
retarded - forward-in-time! - and advanced - backward-in-time! -- waves
...is the truth! (Just wait and see ourselves) --Thanks
Talking head lies! Use one slip and an ordinary hand laser in a dark room, you see bands on each side. The insistence that you don't is to discourage you from seeing the phenomenon alone; the other light goes to the Pharaoh down the little hole in the Pyramid. Try it. At home alone.
Way to go! Love the topic, always been a big fan of quantum theory.
Thanks for your work, I find it very informative.....
It's simple, as a similar experiment to put it into terms, an orange squeezed through a single hole will come out the other side mashed in that shape. When the packets of light pass through the 'Slits' the energy is spread between the two slits, as this is not normal for a photon to be split in this way it creates a wave as it tries to come back together. The reason this cannot be obsevered with instruments is because the excess 'wave' energy is absorbed by the detectors. Pure energy in the form of photons is easily absorbed.
This is maybe not worded correctly but it's a simple interpretation. Not just absorbed but also reflected. I would be interested to see this experiment repeated using different materials for the substrate of the slits. Is it possible that the interference pattern is created by the matter containing the slits interacting with the electrons? Even simple things have their complications! What a great example!
A most interesting hub. I have read a small amount on the subject, and do not pretend to understand much about it, yet.
Sorry to throw a spanner in the works,
Can someone direct me to information on what a photon detector consists of?
Sure the plate on the back shows an interference pattern when the photon is unobstructed. Photon = electron-positron pairs, or quark-antiquark pairs (among others), what exactly does this "plate" detect?
Sorry I am new to this stuff and I thought I would spark some thought into other directions.
I founds some articles of interest,
In this article it goes on to say that it has been solved,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon#Historical_dev
This is one of the Partial theories, Where there is a so called symmetry in space:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon#The_photon_as_
and in the same article on how the different frequencies of photons act in different ways:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon#Second_quantiz
Also in some Bose-Einstein Condensates there has been a wave like formation from matter:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bose–Einstein_condensate#Attractive_interactions
Any Reply is welcome. Thank you for your time
Still much more to come!
@dipless
So the fact that photons act like a wave when they pass through something is impossible, means that photons are particles and waves? one thing is true in physics and life alike, and probably isn't confined to the structure of things that we see in this part of space, is change. Entropy, how amusing.
Since I mentioned entropy, Is anyone able to point me in the direction of interactions between Neutrinos and photons?
or have no studies been conducted on this as of yet?
or have I met a scaling factor I have overlooked?
I think I'll have to google that one!
Please take into account I am no expert in this field.
Thanks Again



















Dame Scribe Level 2 Commenter 2 years ago
Very informative, detailed and well expressed. :) great Hub!